9/11 - The Pentagon

Semper Fidelis

Clintonian Fool: David Tarbell

David Tarbell, director of the Defense Technology Security Administration under Clinton-Gore, ordered the mass shredding of Pentagon records that could have documented some of the most serious Chinagate allegations against the Clinton-Gore administration.

Clinton Hold-over Orders Secret Documents Destroyed

When the DTSA moved its offices, Tarbell, a Clinton holdover at the Pentagon, told subordinates that the new facility couldn't accommodate the documents.

These documents included top secret intelligence reports on foreign weapons programs and front companies, and memoranda documenting Pentagon decisions to allow U.S. companies to sell advanced technology directly to Russian and Chinese military facilities.

Much of the secret material was so highly restricted that documents had to be signed out when viewed. At Tarbell's direction, even those access logs have been destroyed, erasing any paper trail that might show who handled the super-sensitive records.

The entire record of what happened over the past eight years is gone.

"Dave Tarbell bears personal responsibility for giving the Chinese military everything they need to fight the next war. He has been highly successful -- in giving away our military technology." --Stephen D. Bryen, a DOD official under Reagan/Bush.

Bryen created DTSA in 1985 as part of President Reagan's effort to deny the Soviet Union access to advanced Western military technology. He has been a vocal critic of the Clinton administration's decontrol of sensitive technology, testifying before Congress repeatedly on the importance of maintaining controls on U.S. military exports to slow China's military modernization.

"Tarbell endorsed the Clinton administration plans to decontrol supercomputers, which have all gone into the Chinese nuclear-weapons and missile programs. He backed the release of hot-section technology, which has enabled the Chinese military to build new combat jet engines. He promoted the decontrol of military-grade Global Positioning System technologies, which the Chinese are now using to guide their nuclear missiles. He ought to be fired and find another job."

He damn well ought to go to prison.

Not Forgotten: September 11, 2001

The mass murder of 3,000 innocent people on American soil was a declaration of war by an insidious enemy determined on destroying our society, our culture, and all those of us who resist.

They'd like nothing better than for our memories to fade.
Which they have.

They are depending on our divisiveness.
Which we are.

They are counting on us being hopeful of some diplomatic "solution."
Which some deluded politicians are.

They are infiltrating our country while they plot and prepare their next assaults, likely far worse than the ones they have already committed.

I remember the images of the planes being flown into the WTC towers and imagining the horror of the people on the planes and those in the towers.

I remember the images of people jumping from the Twin Towers — head first, feet first, solo, hand-in-hand, to escape the inferno of burning jet fuel. What an absolutely unimaginable choice that must have been.

I remember watching the towers collapse and then seeing that nightmare cloud of dust, filled with god knows what, billowing down the street between buildings, overtaking people. It was like something out of a Sci-Fi movie. Only this was not fiction.

I remember the images of the Pentagon, on fire, walls collapsing.

I remember the image of the aircraft outline burned into the Pennsylvania field and thinking that if anything ever deserved a Hollywood ending, Flight 93 did. But this was real life with real people, and the ending was all too real.

I remember how our enemies cheered.

I remember how Americans came together, political ideologies forgotten (except for the lunatic fringe).

I remember how patriotism became a good thing again and how our military was truly supported.

Americans have notoriously short memories.
But our enemies do not.

They are watching and paying attention; when a politician declares that the war on terror is just a 'bumper sticker', they are listening.

Make no mistake, we are at war, and will be at war for a long time. We are facing enemies who seethe with hatred for America and our way of life, and these enemies are willing to die to bring death and destruction to America.

Despite anti-war rhetoric, the war in Iraq is a part of the overall war on terrorism. It is a war we must win; if we fail to prevail, we will sooner or later be fighting them in America.

We are in a battle to the death, ours or theirs.

Let's make it theirs.


This American Flag was recovered from the smoking rubble of the WTC.

Tag, You're Not It!

The classic schoolyard game of Tag (You're it!) is now not allowed on some school playgrounds.  

Apparently some wussy kids complained that they were 'harassed' or 'chased against their will' during recess.  

So their wussy parents and wussy teachers, people raising and teaching kids that will no doubt be unable to cope with the real world, placed tag on the Politically Correct Banned List.

"It causes a lot of conflict on the playground,"

said Cindy Fesgen, assistant principal of the Discovery Canyon Campus school.

When will these children be allowed to experience conflict so they can learn how to deal with it?  

Apparently never, if their Politically correct idiot parents and teachers have anything to do about it. 

 But running games are still allowed as long as the kids don't chase each other.  

Hey, Football is a running game and involves chasing and being chased. 

 Try doing away with football and see what happens. 

 Talk about conflict.

We're Kicking Ass ... Our Own

When president Bush was recently asked about Iraq, he told the Australian Deputy Prime Minister, "We're kicking ass".

Not only the enemy's ass, but apparently our own as well...

Phil Brennan of NewsMax reports that the Thomas More Law Center charged today that The Secretary of the Navy has punished three top combat officers for reasons of political expediency.

"Despite the exoneration of Marines actually involved in "kicking the enemy's ass" in the fighting in Haditha on November 19, 2005, three senior Marine officers -- Maj.Gen. Richard Huck , Col. Robert Sokoloski, and Col. Stephen Davis -- have been administratively censured by the Secretary of the Navy for their involvement in the Haditha events."

According to Richard Thompson, president and chief counsel of the Thomas More Law Center,

“The Secretary of the Navy has sacrificed three senior, combat-experienced warriors on the altar of political expediency to appease anti-war politicians and the liberal media. These Marines, who have dedicated their lives in defense of our country, deserve better. It’s insanity; it will turn combat commanders into ‘paper pushers’ and will have far-reaching deleterious effect on the fighting spirit of Marines on the ground.”

Brian Rooney, an attorney at the Law Center and a former Marine officer and veteran of the bitter combat in the second battle of Fallujah:

"These men all concluded that a formal investigation was not required. However, it is odd that the Marine Corps has decided to publicly censure these good men who have dedicated their lives to the service of their Corps and country when the recent Article 32 facts are turning out to be what these men on the ground believed them to be — a hard fought battle — not a massacre. The Secretary of the Navy is essentially censuring these men for not investigating a crime that never occurred.”

The decision to launch a criminal investigation of the November 19, 2005 Haditha incident was made three months after its occurrence as a result of a Time Magazine news lead, which military commanders in the field knew was instigated by terrorist propaganda.

The Law Center noted that the censure letters, do confirm that there was no ‘cover-up’ by any of the officers involved.

Added Thompson,

“This action is especially inappropriate considering Staff Sgt. Wuterich is in the middle of his Article 32 Hearing. We have always said that the Marines acted appropriately on November 19th — within the rules of engagement. Cpl. Sharrat has been officially exonerated, Cpl. Tatum has basically been as well, and Capt. Stone, too. The question must be asked: 'Why, now that the facts are coming out in favor of the Marines, has this action been taken?'”

Why indeed?

It's time for politicians and anti-military liberals to realize that we cannot win a politically correct war.

It's time for our troops to be allowed to do what they have been trained to do, "Kick the Enemy's ass" !!

Hillary's 35 Years of (Dubious) Experience

"Change is just a word if you don't have the strength and experience to make it happen. I bring 35 years of experience to make the changes I think we need to make in America."

Changes like bigger government, socialized medicine, inept cronyism and less national security?

Let's take a look at some of Hillary's 35 years of experience:

Yale student Hillary was recruited by leftist professor Tommy The Commie Emerson to monitor the murder trial of The New Haven Nine (Black Panthers) for the ACLU; 

Hillary also helped edit the Yale Review of Law and Social Action – a left-wing journal which promoted cop-killing and featured cartoons of pig-faced police.

She was appointed by President Goober in 1977 to the Legal Services Corp, a federally-funded non-profit organization; 

She oversaw a $90 million-$321 million budget, which she wielded to try to defeat California tax-cutting proposition 9; to support to legal efforts in Michigan to give standing to 'Black English/Ebonics' as a separate language movement; and doled out $260 million to various liberal causes.

Hillary chaired the New World Foundation, a public charity, through which she granted $15,000 to Grassroots International, which funneled the money to the Union of Palestinian Working Women's Committee & the Union of Palestinian Medical Relief Committees (both branches of the PLO).

In her years with the Rose Law Firm in Arkansas, there were the Cattle futures, Whitewater and Castle Grande scandals.

Co-President Hillary's effort for comprehensive health-care reform, aka Hillarycare, was a total debacle.

Once Hillarycare went down in flames, her main focus in the administration became scandal defense and avoiding indictment for perjury and obstruction of justice. Every non-sexual scandal associated with the Clinton White House had Hillary's fingerprints all over it. (Travelgate, Filegate, Fostergate, Chinagate)

She did garner some experience with program development: WHO DB, a $1.6 million taxpayer-funded database that contained: vital statistics, SS #, ethnicity, political associations, sexual preference of MORE than 350,000 members of Congress, state and local officials, journalists, supporters and donors from the lists of the DNC and officials from the Reagan and Bush 41 administrations;

Let's not forget a favorite Clinton ploy - wielding the IRS as a personal weapon (targets included Juanita Broaddrick, Katherine Prudhomme, Kathleen Willey, Paula Jones, Billy Dale, Pat and Glenn Mendoza- any of these sound familiar? All were audited).

Hillary decided to run for the Senate and extended her experience in scandal. Bubba pardoned the FALN terrorists to get Latino support in New York, and the New Square Hassidim to get Jewish support. (Pardongate)

The Clintons left the White House with $400,000 worth of furniture & gifts belonging to the White House, not them. (Lootgate)

As a Senator, Hillary has done nothing of note except to raise massive sums of money for herself and her colleagues and making a lot more money writing and selling her memoirs.

Her efforts on behalf of New York post-9/11 have been exposed as largely belonging her colleague's, Chuck Schumer, for which she took credit.

Hillary has passed no important legislation, except for 20 bills renaming post offices and courthouses and congratulating Alexander Hamilton, Shirley Chisolm, Harriet Tubman, the American Republic, and the Syracuse men's and women's Lacrosse team on their respective accomplishments.

Oh, and her vote for the Iraq War .... it wasn't her fault ....

By her own admission, Hillary didn't bother to read the National Intelligence Estimate on Iraq before voting to authorize President Bush to use force in 2002.
Apparently she was briefed by her staffers who were misled by faulty intelligence.

Is this the experience upon which her candidacy is based?

CNN anchor Bernard Shaw: "Now wait a minute now, this woman brings a lot of strength."

Newsday columnist Jimmy Breslin: "What strength?"

Shaw: "Don’t you agree that she brings a lot of strength to what she is trying to do?"

Breslin: "No, I think that the strength comes from a lot of people on television or in newspapers that just write drivel."

-- CNN’s Inside Politics, July 8, 1999

Hillary and Funny Money, Part $$

Hillary Clinton and funny money go together like Bill Clinton and anything with big boobs.

The California Court of Appeals, Second Appellate District, will hear arguments about whether Hillary Clinton should be a defendant in a lawsuit brought by Hollywood mogul Peter Paul. An earlier ruling dismissed Hillary Clinton from a previous lawsuit under a statute that protects politicians from harassing or frivolous lawsuits. Paul's legal team argues the statute does not apply to a political figure who violates the law.

Attorneys for each side will also debate the inclusion as evidence of a videotape in which Clinton can be heard agreeing to plan a fund-raiser, which was later determined to be illegal by the Federal Elections Commission (FEC).

This videotape "captures the very commission of a crime, namely, that of knowingly soliciting, coordinating and accepting federal campaign contributions far in excess of the legal limit of $2,000."

This harks back to Galagate, an August 2000 Hollywood event that was titled the "Bill Clinton Farewell Tribute" but was in fact a fund raiser for Hillary that took in $1.5 million for Hillary's Senate campaign.

After failing to properly report the money raised, Clinton's campaign finance director, David Rosen, was accused of lying to the FEC and the Clinton Senate campaign paid a $35,000 fine to the FEC.

Paul said:

"Everything I complained about in 2001, and she denied, was supported in the Rosen trial and the FEC. Only her direct knowledge continues to be denied, and the tape contradicts that. Hillary's obstruction is worse than Nixon's obstruction in Watergate."

In a written declaration for the California court filed on April 7, 2006, Clinton said that she did not remember discussions with Paul about the fundraiser.

"I have no recollection whatsoever of discussing any arrangement with him whereby he would support my campaign for the United States Senate in exchange for anything from me or then-President Clinton. I do not believe I would make such a statement because I believe I would remember such a discussion if it had occurred."

(Hillary, the 'smartest woman on earth' apparently has convenient memory lapses)

If Clinton helped to plan the event, it could legally constitute a direct hard money donation to her Senate campaign, and if that is the case, the donation from Paul would be more than a thousand times the legal limit for an individual donation.

Knowingly soliciting an individual contribution of $25,000 or more is a felony punishable by up to five years in prison.

Be still my heart.

"The Clintons represent the worst in modern American politics: ruthless ambition over a desire to serve; preoccupation with political funding over a fair system; opportunism over principle; betrayal of any cause or policy over taking a stand; and a desperation to gain and keep office over any obligation to honor its responsibilities." -- Christopher Reed, in the Los Angles Times

Political Cartoontist: Scott Stantist, The Birmingham News